Detailed information for November 2016
The monthly survey, Sawmills, measures quantities of lumber produced and shipped by Canadian manufacturers.
Data release - February 2, 2017
This survey measures, on a monthly basis, the quantities of lumber that are produced and shipped by Canadian manufacturers.
The quantities of lumber produced and shipped are used as an indicator of the economic condition of the Wood industry and trends in the construction market, as an input to Canada's Gross Domestic Product and as an input into macro- and micro-economic studies to determine market shares and industry trends. The data are also used by the business community, trade associations (including the Council of Forest Industries and l'Association des manufacturiers de bois de sciage du Québec), federal and provincial departments and international organizations.
Reference period: Month
Collection period: During the month following the reference month
- Wood, paper and printing
Data sources and methodology
The target population for this survey includes all sawmills in Canada classified to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), 321111.
The questionnaire for this survey has remained stable over the years, although the format and wording has been modified to maintain its relevance based on feedback from survey respondents and data users.
This is a sample survey with a cross-sectional design.
The frame used for sampling purposes is the Statistics Canada Business Register. The statistical unit is the establishment. The survey population includes all sawmills establishments above certain thresholds that vary by province and by reference year.
A sample of establishments is selected from among units in the survey population based on a one phase probability sampling plan. Establishments are stratified by province, and by revenue. "Take-alls" are selected based on their complexity, their size and on their importance in their industry. A "take-some" sample is also drawn. All sampled units receive questionnaires.
Responding to this survey is mandatory.
Data are collected directly from survey respondents and extracted from administrative files.
Data are collected each month from survey respondents using a mail-out / mail-back process as well as electronic questionnaire. Data capture and preliminary editing are performed simultaneously to ensure validity of the data. Businesses from whom no response has been received or whose data may contain errors are followed-up by telephone, email or fax. To estimate the contribution of units below sampling thresholds, the system derives ratios from Goods and Services Tax (GST) files using a statistical model. The model accounts for the difference between units above the threshold and those below the threshold as well as the time lag between the reference period of the survey and the reference period of the GST file.
Under normal circumstance, data are collected, captured, edited, tabulated and published within 6-8 weeks after the end of the reference month.
View the Questionnaire(s) and reporting guide(s) .
In order to detect errors and internal inconsistencies, automated edits are applied to captured data to verify that totals equal the sum of components and that the data are consistent with previous month's data. Data that fail the edits are subject to manual inspection and possible corrective action.
In addition, subject matter experts analyse the data at a more aggregate level to detect and verify any large month-to-month or year-over-year changes for the industry.
Missing data for the current month are imputed automatically using a number of statistical techniques that use survey data collected during the current cycle as well as auxiliary information sources. These auxiliary sources include survey data from a previous cycle (historical), donor questionnaires and administrative data. Opening stocks are set equal to the value of the closing stocks from the previous month. Closing stocks are calculated by adding production to opening stocks and then subtracting shipments and waste values. The option exists for the subject matter analyst to manually override these imputations with better estimates based on pertinent knowledge about the industry or the business.
As part of the estimation process, survey data are weighted and combined with administrative data to produce final industry estimates.
Survey results are analyzed to ensure comparability with patterns observed in the historical data series and the economic condition of the industry. Information available from other sources such as the Monthly Survey of Manufacturing or MSM (record number 2101), the Building Permits Survey (record number 2802), the media, other government organizations and industry associations are also used in the validation process.
Statistics Canada is prohibited by law from releasing any data which would divulge information obtained under the Statistics Act that relates to any identifiable person, business or organization without the prior knowledge or the consent in writing of that person, business or organization. Various confidentiality rules are applied to all data that are released or published to prevent the publication or disclosure of any information deemed confidential. If necessary, data are suppressed to prevent direct or residual disclosure of identifiable data.
Direct disclosure may occur when the value in a tabulation cell is composed of a few respondents or when the cell is dominated by a few companies. Residual disclosure may occur when confidential information can be derived indirectly by piecing together information from different sources or data series.
Revisions and seasonal adjustment
Monthly, preliminary estimates are provided for the reference month and revised estimates, based on late responses, are provided for the previous month.
Once every year (normally in July), the monthly Sawmills series are revised. These revisions incorporate any data that may have been received after the close of the collection cycle during the previous reference year.
The revised estimates are published in CANSIM.
While considerable efforts have been taken to ensure high standards throughout all stages of collection and processing, the resulting estimates are inevitably subject to a certain degree of non-sampling error. Non-sampling error is not related to sampling and may occur for various reasons including non-response, inaccurate reporting and processing. Errors relating to non-response can be measured. All attempts are made to control inaccurate reporting and processing errors. Totals may not add up to the sum of components due to rounding.
Some respondents may be unable to provide data for numerous reasons (i.e. fire, theft, strike, economic hardship, etc.), while others may be late in responding. To minimize non-response, delinquent respondents are followed up rigorously by phone, email or fax. Data for non-responding units are imputed using industry trend and other related information. Data are revised based on the revision policy for questionnaires that are received after the end of the monthly collection cycles.
Non-response error is calculated using the number of non-responses divided by the number of total expected responses for the units in the sample.
Inaccuracy may result from poor questionnaire design or an inability on the part of respondents to provide the requested information or from misinterpretation of the survey questions. To reduce such errors the format and wording in the questionnaire are reviewed from time to time and modified based on feedback from survey respondents and data users. Respondents are also reminded of the importance of their contribution and of the accuracy of reported information.
These errors may occur at various stages in the processing of survey data such as data entry, verification, editing and tabulation. Data are examined for such errors using automated edits along with an analytical review by subject matter experts. Several checks are performed on the collected data to verify internal consistency and comparability over time.
- Date modified: